flowchart TD 
    A(Tools serve people) --> B(Dependency increases) --> C(People serve tools) -->|consumer-slave mentality towards tools. Beyond 'second threshold', consumer-slave mentality loops in on itself| B
    
    C -->|'austerity', creator-producer-stakeholder mentality towards tools, achieve critical awareness, cut out dependency through re-communalization and cost-minization| D(Conviviality increases) --> A 
  
  • Principal agent problem for tool usage
    • The Principal Agent Problem as the Rootiest Root of the Polycrisis
    • Irrespective of institutions, tool begin to serve their own interests, at the expense of users
    • Has to do with the mindset of the user, active creator vs passive consumer
    • Producer vs consumer mentality?
    • Institutions have an analogous principal-agent problem as tools — both are incentivized through self-preservation to increase dependency
  • What determines consumer-slave vs creator-producer-stakeholder mentality?
    • Context — alienated context prevents ownership, communalistic context promotes ownership
    • “Austerity” as negative space conviviality, an awareness and minimization of unnecessary and addictive tool usage
    • Missing — where to learn “austerity”?
      • Community has incentive for cost-minimization, which includes dependency / tool-minimization
      • Communal cost-minimization teaches austerity
      • What is the opposite of austerity?
        • Gluttony? dependency? unnecessary or addictive dependency. Some kind of laziness, complacency, passivity. Increasingly enslaved through lack of self-autonomy
        • If you have an unnecessary dependency, remove it
  • Convivial tools:
    • Bicycle
    • Swiss army knife
    • Laptop
    • Bible? / moral-health instructions
    • Linux
    • Home server as a convivial tool
    • Grown home
    • Permacultural agriculture
  • Non-convivial tools:
    • Car
    • Phone
    • Plane / Train
    • Dogma
    • Complete home
    • Monocultural agriculture
  • Convivial world
    • Justice, survival, self-determined work
    • Translates to cosmolocalism — local production, global knowledge
    • Divergent Competition and Increasing the Pie
    • Divergent competition as a correlate to examples of convivial worlds
  • Technological paradigms are one-way because they achieve scale and throughput that other paradigms cannot achieve, can only extend the paradigm which may already be exhausted, which may become increasingly non-convivial.