Table of Contents

Highlights

Quote

Earnings guidance was also weak, and the company raised its forecast for fiscal 2026 capex by another 300 billion partner in the AI cycle.

Quote

And by Friday, even the crown jewel of Oracle’s AI strategy—its OpenAI data centers—was showing cracks. Bloomberg disclosed that Oracle has pushed back completion of some U.S. data centers for OpenAI from 2027 to 2028 because of “labor and material shortages.”

Quote

“It’s perfectly plausible that they’re seeing labor and materials shortages,”

Quote

In his view, the AI boom is running directly into the difference between digital speed and physical speed. “The world of bits moves fast. The world of atoms doesn’t. And data centers are where those two worlds collide.”

Quote

Koomey describes an industry where capital can be deployed instantly, but the equipment that capital must buy cannot. The timelines for turbines, transformers, specialized cooling systems, and high-voltage gear have stretched into years, he explained.

Quote

“This happens every time there’s a massive shift in investment,” he said. “Eventually manufacturers catch up, but not right away. Reality intervenes.”

Quote

While Oracle’s stock slide is dramatic, the bond-market reaction may be more important. Oracle’s bond yields blew out, with some newer notes that were once investment grade now trading like junk, as its credit-risk gauge hit the highest level since 2009. It signals that investors who lend to companies, historically the most sober observers of tech cycles, are beginning to reassess the risk of lending into the AI buildout.

Quote

Oracle, however, has made some of the biggest deals out of the five, like i[ts 100 billion.

Quote

So while Oracle isn’t the only tech giant tapping the debt markets for its AI outlays, its size, cash generation, and credit ratings make it one of the most leveraged.


Clean Copy

December 13, 2025, 5:03 AM ET

Oracle chairman of the board and chief technology officer Larry Ellison delivers a keynote address during the 2019 Oracle OpenWorld on September 16, 2019 in San Francisco, California.

Oracle Chairman of and Chief Technology Officer Larry Ellison delivers a keynote address during the 2019 Oracle OpenWorld on September 16, 2019 in San Francisco, California. Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

Oracle’s rapid descent from market darling to market warning sign is revealing something deeper about the AI boom, experts say: no matter how euphoric investors became over the last two years, the industry can’t outrun the laws of physics—or the realities of debt financing.

Recommended Video


Shares of Oracle have plunged 45% from their September high and lost 14% this week after a messy earnings report revealed it spent 8.25 billion expected by analysts.

Earnings guidance was also weak, and the company raised its forecast for fiscal 2026 capex by another 300 billion partner in the AI cycle.

“We have ambitious achievable goals for capacity delivery worldwide,” Oracle co-CEO Clay Magouyrk said on an earnings call this week.

Investors worry how Oracle will pay for these massive outlays as its underlying revenue streams, cloud revenue and cloud-infrastructure sales, also fell short of Wall Street’s expectations. Analysts have described its AI buildout as debt-fueled, even though the company does not explicitly link specific debt to specific capital projects in its filings.

And by Friday, even the crown jewel of Oracle’s AI strategy—its OpenAI data centers—was showing cracks. Bloomberg disclosed that Oracle has pushed back completion of some U.S. data centers for OpenAI from 2027 to 2028 because of “labor and material shortages.”

“It’s perfectly plausible that they’re seeing labor and materials shortages,” said data-center researcher Jonathan Koomey, who has advised utilities and hyperscalers including IBM and AMD. In his view, the AI boom is running directly into the difference between digital speed and physical speed. “The world of bits moves fast. The world of atoms doesn’t. And data centers are where those two worlds collide.”

Although Bloomberg didn’t identify which specific facilities were being delayed, Koomer said one likely candidate is Project Jupiter, Oracle’s gargantuan data-center complex proposed for a remote stretch of New Mexico. Local reporting has described Jupiter as a $160 billion-plus mega-campus, one of the most ambitious AI infrastructure projects ever attempted and a core piece of Oracle’s commitment to provide compute to OpenAI.

Koomey describes an industry where capital can be deployed instantly, but the equipment that capital must buy cannot. The timelines for turbines, transformers, specialized cooling systems, and high-voltage gear have stretched into years, he explained. Large transformers can take four to five years to arrive. Industrial gas turbines, which companies increasingly rely on for building microgrids, can take six or seven.

Even if a company is willing to pay a premium, the factories that produce these components cannot magically expand overnight, and the manufacturing industry trained to install them is already stretched thin. AI companies may want to move at the pace of model releases, but the construction and utility sectors operate on a fundamentally different timeline.

Koomey made it clear that the physical constraints he describes apply to all hyperscalers, but Oracle worries investors in particular because it’s getting into the AI infrastructure game late and tying much of its capex to one customer, OpenAI.

“This happens every time there’s a massive shift in investment,” he said. “Eventually manufacturers catch up, but not right away. Reality intervenes.”

That friction becomes ever clearer once the financial limit enters the picture. While Oracle’s stock slide is dramatic, the bond-market reaction may be more important. Oracle’s bond yields blew out, with some newer notes that were once investment grade now trading like junk, as its credit-risk gauge hit the highest level since 2009. It signals that investors who lend to companies, historically the most sober observers of tech cycles, are beginning to reassess the risk of lending into the AI buildout.

For the past few decades, the norm for tech companies was to pay for growth with earnings. Now many of them, including Oracle, are turning to credit markets to fund their sprawling expansions. According to a Bank of America analysis, the five biggest AI hyperscalers— Google, Meta, Amazon, Microsoft and Oracle—have collectively issued roughly $121 billion in bonds this year to fund AI data-center buildouts, a level of issuance far above historical averages and one that signals a major shift toward debt financing for infrastructure.

Oracle, however, has made some of the biggest deals out of the five, like i [ts 100 billion. The other four are also in stronger cash positions and have higher credit ratings (AA/A vs Oracle in BBB area), and are able to generate large positive free cash flow. So while Oracle isn’t the only tech giant tapping the debt markets for its AI outlays, its size, cash generation, and credit ratings make it one of the most leveraged.

Debt investors do not necessarily need blowout returns; they just need certainty that they will get their money back, with interest. If confidence wavers even a little, yields rise.

“This feels like the 1998 moment,” Anuj Kapur, CEO of CloudBees and a former tech executive during the dot-com era, told Axios. There’s enormous promise, but also enormous uncertainty about how quickly the returns show up.

Koomer saw a simple throughline.

“You have a disconnect between the tech people who have lots of money and are used to moving super fast, and the people who make the equipment and build the facilities, who need years to scale up their manufacturing,” he said.

Join us at the Fortune Workplace Innovation Summit May 19–20, 2026, in Atlanta. The next era of workplace innovation is here—and the old playbook is being rewritten. At this exclusive, high-energy event, the world’s most innovative leaders will convene to explore how AI, humanity, and strategy converge to redefine, again, the future of work. Register now.


Annotated Copy

AI

December 13, 2025, 5:03 AM ET

Oracle chairman of the board and chief technology officer Larry Ellison delivers a keynote address during the 2019 Oracle OpenWorld on September 16, 2019 in San Francisco, California.

Oracle Chairman of and Chief Technology Officer Larry Ellison delivers a keynote address during the 2019 Oracle OpenWorld on September 16, 2019 in San Francisco, California. Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

Oracle’s rapid descent from market darling to market warning sign is revealing something deeper about the AI boom, experts say: no matter how euphoric investors became over the last two years, the industry can’t outrun the laws of physics—or the realities of debt financing.

Recommended Video


Shares of Oracle have plunged 45% from their September high and lost 14% this week after a messy earnings report revealed it spent 8.25 billion expected by analysts.

==Earnings guidance was also weak, and the company raised its forecast for fiscal 2026 capex by another 300 billion partner in the AI cycle.==

“We have ambitious achievable goals for capacity delivery worldwide,” Oracle co-CEO Clay Magouyrk said on an earnings call this week.

Investors worry how Oracle will pay for these massive outlays as its underlying revenue streams, cloud revenue and cloud-infrastructure sales, also fell short of Wall Street’s expectations. Analysts have described its AI buildout as debt-fueled, even though the company does not explicitly link specific debt to specific capital projects in its filings.

And by Friday, even the crown jewel of Oracle’s AI strategy—its OpenAI data centers—was showing cracks. Bloomberg disclosed that Oracle has pushed back completion of some U.S. data centers for OpenAI from 2027 to 2028 because of “labor and material shortages.”

“It’s perfectly plausible that they’re seeing labor and materials shortages,” said data-center researcher Jonathan Koomey, who has advised utilities and hyperscalers including IBM and AMD. In his view, the AI boom is running directly into the difference between digital speed and physical speed. “The world of bits moves fast. The world of atoms doesn’t. And data centers are where those two worlds collide.”

Although Bloomberg didn’t identify which specific facilities were being delayed, Koomer said one likely candidate is Project Jupiter, Oracle’s gargantuan data-center complex proposed for a remote stretch of New Mexico. Local reporting has described Jupiter as a $160 billion-plus mega-campus, one of the most ambitious AI infrastructure projects ever attempted and a core piece of Oracle’s commitment to provide compute to OpenAI.

Koomey describes an industry where capital can be deployed instantly, but the equipment that capital must buy cannot. The timelines for turbines, transformers, specialized cooling systems, and high-voltage gear have stretched into years, he explained. Large transformers can take four to five years to arrive. Industrial gas turbines, which companies increasingly rely on for building microgrids, can take six or seven.

Even if a company is willing to pay a premium, the factories that produce these components cannot magically expand overnight, and the manufacturing industry trained to install them is already stretched thin. AI companies may want to move at the pace of model releases, but the construction and utility sectors operate on a fundamentally different timeline.

Koomey made it clear that the physical constraints he describes apply to all hyperscalers, but Oracle worries investors in particular because it’s getting into the AI infrastructure game late and tying much of its capex to one customer, OpenAI.

“This happens every time there’s a massive shift in investment,” he said. “Eventually manufacturers catch up, but not right away. Reality intervenes.”

That friction becomes ever clearer once the financial limit enters the picture. While Oracle’s stock slide is dramatic, the bond-market reaction may be more important. Oracle’s bond yields blew out, with some newer notes that were once investment grade now trading like junk, as its credit-risk gauge hit the highest level since 2009. It signals that investors who lend to companies, historically the most sober observers of tech cycles, are beginning to reassess the risk of lending into the AI buildout.

For the past few decades, the norm for tech companies was to pay for growth with earnings. Now many of them, including Oracle, are turning to credit markets to fund their sprawling expansions. According to a Bank of America analysis, the five biggest AI hyperscalers— Google, Meta, Amazon, Microsoft and Oracle—have collectively issued roughly $121 billion in bonds this year to fund AI data-center buildouts, a level of issuance far above historical averages and one that signals a major shift toward debt financing for infrastructure.

Oracle, however, has made some of the biggest deals out of the five, like i [ts 100 billion. The other four are also in stronger cash positions and have higher credit ratings (AA/A vs Oracle in BBB area), and are able to generate large positive free cash flow. So while Oracle isn’t the only tech giant tapping the debt markets for its AI outlays, its size, cash generation, and credit ratings make it one of the most leveraged.

Debt investors do not necessarily need blowout returns; they just need certainty that they will get their money back, with interest. If confidence wavers even a little, yields rise.

“This feels like the 1998 moment,” Anuj Kapur, CEO of CloudBees and a former tech executive during the dot-com era, told Axios. There’s enormous promise, but also enormous uncertainty about how quickly the returns show up.

Koomer saw a simple throughline.

“You have a disconnect between the tech people who have lots of money and are used to moving super fast, and the people who make the equipment and build the facilities, who need years to scale up their manufacturing,” he said.

Join us at the Fortune Workplace Innovation Summit May 19–20, 2026, in Atlanta. The next era of workplace innovation is here—and the old playbook is being rewritten. At this exclusive, high-energy event, the world’s most innovative leaders will convene to explore how AI, humanity, and strategy converge to redefine, again, the future of work. Register now.

About the Author

  • big tech

    Oracle earnings may not be enough to assuage debt, AI deal fears

    By and
  • investing

    There have been head fakes before, but this time may be different as the latest stock rotation out of AI is just getting started, analysts say

    By
  • ai

    Oracle slides by most since January on mounting AI spending

    By , and Others
  • investing

    Oracle’s huge AI bets are spooking Wall Street—a 12% plunge wiped out the market’s early gains

    By
  • ai

    More Big Tech company debt ‘would increase the macro risks associated with the AI build-out,’ Goldman Sachs warns

    By
  • ai

    Bank of America predicts an ‘air pocket,’ not an AI bubble, fueled by mountains of debt piling up from the data center rush

    By

Latest in AI



AI

What happens to old AI chips? They’re still put to good use and don’t depreciate that fast, analyst says

By December 15, 2025

35 minutes ago

AI

Google cofounder Sergey Brin said he was ‘spiraling’ before returning to work on Gemini—and staying retired ‘would’ve been a big mistake’

By December 15, 2025

54 minutes ago

Crypto

Bittensor, the AI-linked cryptocurrency founded by a former Google engineer, just halved its supply. Here’s what that means

By December 15, 2025

2 hours ago

AI

Businesses face a confusing patchwork of AI policy and rules. Is clarity on the horizon?

By December 15, 2025

3 hours ago

AI

The big AI New Year’s resolution for businesses in 2026: ROI

By December 15, 2025

3 hours ago

AI

2025 was the year of agentic AI. How did we do?

By December 15, 2025

3 hours ago


Most Popular



placeholder alt text

Uncategorized

Transforming customer support through intelligent AI operations

By November 26, 2025

19 days ago

placeholder alt text

Success

40% of Stanford undergrads receive disability accommodations—but it’s become a college-wide phenomenon as Gen Z try to succeed in the current climate

By December 12, 2025

3 days ago

placeholder alt text

Success

Apple cofounder Ronald Wayne sold his 10% stake for 400 billion

By December 12, 2025

3 days ago

placeholder alt text

Politics

Trump admits he can’t tell if the GOP will control the House after next year’s elections. ‘I don’t know when all of this money is going to kick in’

By December 14, 2025

21 hours ago

placeholder alt text

Economy

The Fed just ‘Trump-proofed’ itself with a unanimous move to preempt a potential leadership shake-up

By December 12, 2025

3 days ago

placeholder alt text

Economy

Kevin Hassett says he’d be happy to talk to Trump every day as Fed chair, but the president’s opinion would have ‘no weight’ on the FOMC

By December 14, 2025

23 hours ago